What is Extradition?

by | Jul 26, 2022 | extradition, international fugitive, US extradition | 2 comments

Extradition Explained: Legal Processes and Famous Cases

Extradition is the formal process through which one state surrenders an individual to another state for criminal prosecution. This procedure involves an extradition treaty between the countries and is essential for managing fugitives who cross international borders.

What is an Extradition Treaty?

An extradition treaty specifies transferring an accused person from one country to another to stand trial. When such a treaty is in place, an extradition warrant is issued to arrest the fugitive and transport them to the requesting country.

Modern treaties often adopt a dual criminality approach, listing extraditable and punishable crimes between the two countries. Historically, treaties listed specific offences agreed upon for extradition. Generally, extradition applies to crimes attracting a sentence of more than one year.

Treaties also outline circumstances under which extradition may be denied. Most authorities refuse to extradite individuals for military or political offences, except in cases of terrorism or violence. Some states avoid extraditing individuals to countries where capital punishment is likely unless assurances are given that such punishment will not be imposed.

U.S. Extradition Processes

Extradition from the United States

The extradition process from the U.S. begins with a foreign government requesting assistance from the U.S. State Department. The request includes:

  • The person sought
  • The charges
  • Relevant documents
  • Arrest warrants
  • Evidence against the defendant

If the foreign authorities believe the person is a flight risk, they may request provisional arrest and detention before submitting all necessary materials. The Secretary of State forwards this request to the Department of Justice (DOJ).

The DOJ reviews compliance with treaty regulations, issues an arrest warrant, takes the fugitive into custody, and presents the case before a judge. If probable cause exists, the matter returns to the Secretary of State for a final decision on extradition.

Extradition to the United States

A federal or state prosecutor collaborates with relevant agencies to determine whether the crime warrants the cost of extradition. The prosecutor prepares an application for the DOJ, which, upon approval, sends the request to the U.S. embassy and then to the foreign authorities. The process varies by country, but once approved, the U.S. Marshals Service escorts the fugitive back to the U.S.

Rules of Extradition in the United States

The U.S. extradition process follows the constitution and Federal Code of Laws (18 U.S. Code Chapter 209), requiring:

  • Properly detailed extradition documents
  • Charges against the accused in the requesting country
  • The person named in the request must match the person charged
  • The petitioner must be from the requesting country

Extradition Between Countries

Countries primarily cooperate using extradition treaties. For international extradition, the U.S. files a complaint with a U.S. court, provides charges and treaty requirements and issues a warrant to the Secretary of State. The Secretary then contacts the foreign government where the fugitive resides.

Some countries, including China, Russia, Bahrain, Namibia, and North Korea, do not have extradition treaties with the U.S., but they can still negotiate extradition on a case-by-case basis. For instance, Edward Snowden sought refuge in Russia, avoiding prosecution because there was no treaty between the two countries.

Famous Extradition Cases

Carlos Ghosn

Carlos Ghosn, the former CEO of Nissan, faced charges of financial misconduct in Japan. In 2019, while on bail, he escaped to Lebanon. Lebanon has no extradition treaty with Japan, allowing Ghosn to avoid prosecution. His case highlights the complexities of international law and extradition treaties.

Julian Assange

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was charged with publishing classified documents and facing extradition to the U.S. from the UK. After a lengthy legal battle, a UK court ruled in favour of extradition in 2022. Assange’s case demonstrates the intricate nature of extradition laws and the political considerations involved.

Meng Wanzhou

Huawei’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, was arrested at Vancouver International Airport on December 1, 2018, at the request of the United States. The U.S. government accused Meng of fraudulently circumventing sanctions against Iran through a Hong Kong-based subsidiary, Skycom.

Her case highlighted the geopolitical implications and challenges of modern extradition laws. In September 2021, Meng reached a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, allowing her to return to China without pleading guilty.

Meng’s legal team argued against her extradition on multiple grounds, including claims of political motivation and procedural irregularities. Her detention strained China-Canada relations, leading to the arrest of two Canadian citizens in China, which was widely viewed as a retaliatory action. This case highlighted the geopolitical implications and challenges of modern extradition laws.

Anne Sacoolas

Anne Sacoolas, an American citizen, was involved in a fatal traffic accident in the UK in 2019, resulting in the death of 19-year-old Harry Dunn. Sacoolas, the wife of a U.S. diplomat, fled the UK shortly after the incident, claiming diplomatic immunity.

The UK requested her extradition for charges of causing death by dangerous driving. The U.S. denied the request, citing diplomatic immunity, leading to significant public outcry and ongoing debates about applying diplomatic immunity in such cases.

To resolve the situation, the Dunn family pursued civil action against Sacoolas in the U.S., resulting in a settlement in 2021. However, the criminal charges in the UK remain unresolved, and Sacoolas continues to reside in the U.S.

Additional Detailed Case Studies

Roman Polanski

Roman Polanski, the renowned film director, fled the United States in 1978 after pleading guilty to unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. He took refuge in France, which has no extradition treaty with the U.S.

Polanski’s case has been a prolonged legal saga, with multiple attempts by U.S. authorities to extradite him. Despite various legal proceedings and international warrants, Polanski remains in France, highlighting the challenges and limitations of extradition treaties.

Edward Snowden

Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor, leaked classified information in 2013, revealing global surveillance programs. Snowden fled to Hong Kong and later to Russia, where he was granted asylum. The U.S. charged him with espionage, but due to the lack of an extradition treaty between the U.S. and Russia, Snowden remains in Russia. His case underscores the political and diplomatic complexities often intertwined with extradition.

Conclusion

Extradition is a complex process essential for maintaining international law and order. Understanding how extradition treaties work, the legal procedures involved, and the circumstances under which extradition can be denied provides valuable insights into the intricacies of global justice.

The cases of Carlos Ghosn, Meng Wanzhou, Julian Assange, Anne Sacoolas, Roman Polanski, and Edward Snowden illustrate the diverse challenges and political ramifications that can arise in extradition cases.

Comprehending the legal landscape of extradition is crucial for individuals seeking a new identity, identity protection, or contemplating a safe disappearance. Navigating these waters requires awareness of the legal strategies employed by fugitives and the potential consequences of international law enforcement actions.

In a world where borders are increasingly permeable and international cooperation is paramount, the extradition process remains a cornerstone of global justice. Whether for justice or protection, knowing the intricacies of extradition can help individuals make informed decisions about their identities and legal futures.

If you would like to work with a professional team to help you transition to a life of freedom, contact Amicus Int. for New Identity services today.

If you would like to work with a professional team that can help make your transition to a life of freedom, contact Amicus Int. for New Identity services today.